The disparity in pay between men and women has been discussed for years. In a
USA Today Op-Ed piece, the debate on why women don't fare as well as men on the pay scale continued. One view is that
career choices and business ventures are bigger factors than gender bias:
The fact is, women's career choices have more to do with the pay difference than does discrimination
Another little-noticed part of the pay gap is that women are more reluctant than men to convert skills into business ventures.
The
opposing view is that discrimination prevents women from getting salaries they deserve:
Why the wage gap?
Historical discrimination
"Sticky floor" and "glass ceiling" effects
Occupational segregation
Women's failure to negotiate salaries
Manipulating the market
Why do you think women earn less?
Comments
So they can be exploited by
So they can be exploited by those who love to control the things belong to GOD.
I think another issue as to
I think another issue as to why there is a pay difference is the assumption that a woman has a man at home supplementing her income, therefore, she doesn't need a salary on par with men. Due to the expectation that men will serve as the primary breadwinner, the work that men do are rewarded with greater salaries than women because he is expected to use his income to take care of his family. This is, for one, an erroneous assumption because depending on the type of work you do, a woman could earn more than men. Secondly, this problem is exacerbated for black people because black men's salaries are not on par with their white male peers. So while black men expect to take on the role of primary breadwinner, by circumstance (essentially institutional racism), black men cannot support their wives and children at the same rate as white men. Thus, it is imperative for black men and women to both work and re-write the traditional conventions of how finances should work in marriage - because the rules do not apply to us similarly.
Another issue for the lowered salaries is the realities of women raising children by themselves. The greatest predicator of poverty is to be raised in a single parent female headed household. No, I'm not passing judgment. I am stating fact. By being a woman AND a single parent, one's chances for upward mobility is greatly diminished. Add race to the mix and well....
I also believe that women have been systematically denied access to the "informal" networking by which men make business decisions, give promotions and raises. Many-a-business meeting was held in "gendered" spaces such as topless bars, sporting events and on the golf course. This puts women at a great disadvantage. We settle for the salary given to us because we don't want to lose our jobs...but what this does is reinforces a perception of low self-worth.
Finally, I believe in the whole notion of the "2nd shift" whereby women come home to a second job of cooking, cleaning and caring for children. This work is undervalued and not paid. It has the potential to hinder a woman's rise to the top since America does not have very many "family friendly" policies in the workplace (though we all complain about a lack of family values). If I'm a corporate relations officer, for instance, and my child gets sick, usually the school will contact the mother first. She is expected to take off work and rush to pick up her child. There isn't the same expectation for the father which means his chance of moving up and securing a higher salary is much greater than his wife's.
Without family friendly employment policies, recognition for work done outside of the home and black families re-writing the marriage script based on our reality, the pay equity issue will manifest itself in a variety of ugly ways.
I must agree with everyone
I must agree with everyone who has spoken so far. Lisa...I feel your pain! Kisha should have a safety net just in case Tyrone decides to pack his bag(s)...but isn't that what marriage is for (or rather divorce laws)? An intimate relationship between two people should not be initiated before each person's character is evaluated for good and bad behaviors. They both show up sooner or later...we shouldn't jump the gun to hook up with someone before we know them.
I also agree with jai. Our society is very patriarchal. Men pretty much rule and have set the rules...some of which still discriminate not only against women but African Americans too. Women only gained the right to vote in the last century. African American men were legally permitted to vote in the late 1800s but were systemically prohibited from the right to vote much the same way Jim Crow laws kept the races separated. But times are changing along with the establishment's ability to discriminate against women.
Whereas women were once only permitted to hold certain positions which paid certain amounts (such as teaching, nursing, etc.), more and more women are entering career fields which pay better salaries such as law, medicine, and engineering. The question is whether women's salaries are equal to or less than their male counterparts. I don't have the data on it...but I would venture to say that they're not.
I would be interested in knowing what Condoleezza Rice earned in comparison to Colin Powell as secretary of state. Her salary has been reported to have been between $150,000 and $180,000 in her roles in the current administration including as Assistant to the President. That is nothing to sneeze at. Not only is she earning more than most average wage-earning Americans but she is earning more than most wage-earning men.
In that regard I would have to concede that we women earn what we settle for in terms of education, jobs and yes even relationships. As a teacher, my salary is nowhere near Condeleezza's...but, my starting salary will be the same as the male counterpart with the same qualifications, education and experience...otherwise the union will be hearing from me.
Women are taught to settle,
Women are taught to settle, not to negotiate. Women are taught to accept less and pay more. Women are taught to demonstrate stability and reliability without holding others accountable. Women are not taught they deserve less; they are just given less to work with and expected to produce more. When society assigns depreciated value to a group of people, it becomes the norm and with it acceptance and integration of the norm within the very group. The uphill battle begins in the minds of capable women caught up in political and economic games not meant to include them. Gender bias is alive and well.
Thankfully, women are taking their ideas and undervalued skill set to the marketplace.
I will try my best to stick
I will try my best to stick as close to this subject as possible. But my thoughts have always been this: Men have structured society and the working environment to favor them in their dominance quest for power and manhood. Most men that I know love to be the high ranking bread winner of the family. I have no problem with that but wait…pause a second… Why is it difficult for a man… no let’s re-phrase this… Why is it sooo hard for a black man to share his bread in a relationship? Why is it that black men have become so giving-less towards family structure? Women are labeled gold-diggers on one side of the fence if too dependent on men and too ambitious on the other side of making more monies than men. So do we wait on Fred Flintstone to bring home the bacon for Wilma and Pebbles or do we create a security blanket of our own? In all of our wisdom-who wants to be left in the cold without food or shelter? We would love to give up the hard working days to a man we could trust. Not necessarily a stay at home mom but just giving a man his proper position-Head of Household. But men how can you be head of household when you don’t want to pay for the castle? Paying half the rent is a room-mate deal-we don’t need that. In order to be king of the castle-men-you need to pay the castle mortgage.
Now I may get a few frowns are bad response on this one but hey that’s okay. I’m not praising one man to put another one down. But check these facts out I witness to be true. White men that I have met-have no problem in structuring themselves to be the bread winner-but…but… but… they are more inclined to give freely than black men are. They give without suspicion, without an ill will or after-thought or damaging illusion of all women are out to steal my monies...I guess the saying is you can’t receive with you fist closed. .
I hope that I get no crucifixion for this one but its true-very true. Women fight so hard to create a world they can depend on. We don’t want to wake up one morning and find Terrence has packed his grip-left you a voicemail that he has run off for a new and exciting life with another greener grass adventure. The saying is written in a man’s heart and the lyrics to his national anthem is this: “this is a man’s world” but from a woman point of view: Be the bread winner; I have no problem with the structure for more money-but don’t bump your gums or reject the fact of your responsibilities as a man. Don’t discriminate the pay scale just to hold all monies in your possession as a thief does when robbing a bank. If you want all your monies to yourself do the right thing expand the pay scales so that male/female can benefit on an equal rank.
Power is a pitiful thing when used to discriminate for self gain. Men in all of your quest for power-visualize an important structure that will keep more monies in your pocket. Expand the pay scale for women so your life will be a lot easier. Whether you are the head Negro in charge or white man in charge-expand to get relief in your life.
Just a thought a little away from the subject!